![]() Surprise police surprised ( ) » (1 comment) The larger narrative they're trying to portray is that Hillary Clinton has become more closed off and combative with the press since she had.the green peace run in verifying Sanders statements about her domestic energy policy. If the donors were so intent on keeping her words private, putting this event on with the press capable of hearing her speech is a failure of her fundraising organization. It's just another layer of secrecy and intrigue she is injecting that doesn't need to be there. Why is she disguising what she is saying at a fundraising event that she feels white noise machines are necessary to cover her tracks? Why take the steps to intentionally stifle her words? Timujin: Lando Lincoln: timujin: sithon: This sounds like someone's opinion of what happened. If you want to hear what she has to say, either pay the $18k is takes to hear it and get some dried up chicken or pay the $1k it takes to get a waiter to sneak in a bug. I am only surprised others candidates don't do the same. However, to retort with "Oh, yeah? Prove it." is also dumb. That's precisely what they were trying to avoid.Īnd what I'm saying is that standing outside and whining that she's "not transparent" because she used a white noise machine to keep a private event private is more an indictment of the reporter's lack of preparedness than it is of any nefariousness on Clinton's part. ![]() Or, hell, just bribe someone working there to surreptitiously record her remarks, get yourself a Mitt Romney 47% moment. My question, and this is coming from a Sanders supporter, is why does it matter? If you wanted to hear what she had to say, donate and be on the inside. Lando Lincoln: timujin: sithon: This sounds like someone's opinion of what happened.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |